Community Moderation update
In September 2007 we launched Community Moderation, a system that allows trusted Answers users to work together to report and remove content that breaks the Community Guidelines and the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Due to its very nature, there is always a great deal of interest in this system and how it’s working, so we wanted to give you an update on it and how the subsequent appeals process works.
What is Community Moderation?
Traditionally on Answers if a question or answer broke the Community Guidelines or Yahoo! Terms of Service, an Answers user could report it. This report is reviewed by a real person and a decision is made whether to keep it up or to delete it. This system is still in place.
However, Community Moderation works in parallel to the old system. Once a report is submitted to Yahoo!, Community Moderation automatically measures the contributions and reporting history of both the reporter and the person being reported.
Community Moderation then determines whether it can remove the reported question or answer directly from the site based on community input or whether further review is needed.
So how do I build a good reputation?
First and foremost, it’s important to familiarise yourself with the Community Guidelines. If you’re interested in reporting bad content on Answers, it’s very important that you’re accurate. When you feel you have a good idea about what’s acceptable on Answers as you begin to report content, you will build a good reputation and gain influence.
On the other hand, misuse of the new system will result in a lowered reputation. A low reputation means that the power to report and remove potential abuse is diminished, and may even risk suspension.
The community is very important to the Answers team: without it the site is nothing, so we have set up protection mechanisms to filter out specific targeting of one user by another. Similarly the system promotes accurate reporters, giving them more influence.
How accurate is Community Moderation?
According to our current analysis 94% of reports removed by Community Moderation in the US were correctly removed. Occasionally it makes mistakes, which we would strongly encourage you to appeal, but on the whole your efforts in reporting are making a massive and accurate difference to the site.
What should I do if my content is erroneously removed by the community?
By the very nature of the system, incorrect reports are occasionally going to happen. If your question or answer is reported, we’ll send you an email stating that it has been removed. If you feel that the system’s decision was incorrect, first read the Community Guidelines to check. If you think there’s a strong case, click on the “Appeal” link in the email to submit an appeal. This will be reviewed by a real person. If we agree, your question or answer will reappear on Answers, and the member(s) who reported you will have less influence when they report potential abuse in the future.
As a team, we’d like to strongly emphasise the importance of appealing, once you’ve read the Community Guidelines and are certain your content has been removed in error. This is because if your appeal is successful, not only will your content be reinstated but your reputation will be boosted and those that reported you will lose reputation.



thanks for this blog team
was on high time ^5
Thank You SO much for the update!
I still have a question though:
There is much ado about the reasons for a violation NOT appearing on the notice. Has this been addressed? Or are y’all just asking users to “read the Community Guidelines” to try to figure out what exactly was wrong with their post?
Many users (especially newer users) really have no idea as to why they are receiving the VN. If the reason for the content_removal is being stated within the Violation Notice, then a user will be able to learn from the violation/warning and refrain from submitting another similar post.
If a “reason” is NOT clearly defined in the VN, a user just gets frustrated and/or is left scratching their head in dismay.
I haven’t had a VN in a very very long time, so I don’t know if this HAS been addressed or not. It seems that the Y!A-suggestion board is continually bombarded with posts from individuals that haven’t any idea as to what they did wrong and many automatically assume that they are being reported by “some troll” who just doesn’t like them.
So is a reason being stated in the VN?
Thanks for the update!
Community moderation has been a dismal failure in the US site and is probably the cause of the majority of abuse on Y!A.
In the Scottish soccer section,users have up to 10 profiles,they use these multiple accounts to violate people they simply don’t like,there is a lot of anti Irish/catholic posts,i have had posts violated in this manner,the problem here is that the bigots use abbreviations that are bigoted but the Yahoo team have not got a clue about what they stand for ie”,BJK,IS ABOUT CHILD ABUSE,” FTP is for “fuck the Pope”,but yahoo doesn’t pick up on this,you need people who have local knoladge in cases like this.
Hey Colin,
Thanks for your tip. In general we would urge you to report questions and answers like that, adding a reason in the Additional Details field. This ensures the content will be appropriately dealt with.
However in this case if you would like email us anything you’d like to draw our attention to, please do so to: y_answrs_team_uk@yahoo.co.uk
Thanks!
– Yahoo! UK & Ireland Answers team